Seil Chat

Losing the rag again and laying down the law again NB.
So be it.

Now I find that last rejoinder very interesting In all my previous interchanges with Bill McD there has been an element of civility. This last riposte from that quarter from Bill McD does not ring true and is absolutely reminiscent of our esteemed administrator's responses and it begs the question 1...

In all our exchanges, Bill Mc, I have never cast aspersions on your character - only on your perceived adherence to a political ideal which you consider completely above reproach - can do no wrong - and which all others should stand in awe of - a position which is shared even more vehemently by Twee...

Ok another try -tweedledee My last posting suggested that you two were obsessed with denigrating anything or anyone who might perchance be a threat to the (perceived) unsullied reputation of the SNP. This unsullied reputation (and presumably proof of their exemplary record in government or oppositio...

My last reply to Tweedledum and Tweedledee seems to have suffered the censor's cut.

This situation is really getting to the pathetic stage. NB - get a grip. You ran a reasonably successful Forum for a number of years with a cloak of anonymity for your subscribers. Unfortunately you decided to make it a site for your propaganda on the upcoming referendum, and received some adverse c...

Where do you get your paranoia from?

How will you check up on dogs?

Bill - although severely tempted, I have refrained from posting similar remarks on the Slate.
However on this site, I feel no constraint , and will continue to do so, as you probably will be aware, until NB finds an excuse to gag me.

Oh you poor martyr!
Nobody was suggesting banning you - just suggesting that some of your vitriolic remarks were a bit out of keeping with the general tone of the discussion on the Slate.

Bill - you are like a dog with a bone. This must rank among the daftest of political ideas for a long time. With the SNP riding high at the moment (at the moment) in the polls, some hothead members conjure up the idea of a splinter group to stand against them - and possibly in a few cases split the ...

Aye ! you are a determined cuss. Now that your site is back up and running it's back to trawling the press for anything to defame the opposition. And the National should keep you supplied with ammunition, being that you are both in the same boat. I await the next instalment with mild interest, but d...

Steve,
Delivered to Richard Wesley (as instructed) last Wednesday 15th.
Must be an early season for them as some of mine are flowering now.
Let me know if you need any more printed.
Jim.

My remark was not directed to Panelbase.

That's the boot in for this week.

Actually - No. I mean that anything that suggests that the SNP can do no wrong, will automatically have alarm bells ringing. Also, character assasinations with the inference that "Our lot would not do that". So, if you think it is in your interests to continue with the present regime, plea...

I'm happy with that - so peace, until the next appearance of blatant SNP propoganda.

Ah well. The readership of these pages will have to make up their own minds about the relative merits of the points expressed, and draw their own conclusions.

OK - I admit I never attributed the words "whiter than white" to our admin. This was a bit of a "one liner" inference in reply to his posting which contained a huge dose of inference So, as it has to be rational, here is my take on the last NB posting. The first statement suggest...

Steve,
Just let me know your requirements - we can print at the drop of a hat.
Postage would be expensive.
I have one volunteer deliverer but it would need about 5 or 6 at a guess.
Can also supply number of households in each district.
Just advise.
Jim.